Practical criteria, methods and guides for researching opportunities, interpreting data and building more responsible strategies. Specific media and data remain private.
A practical framework for deciding whether an idea has standalone editorial potential, fits a transparent sponsored collaboration, or should first be developed on your own site.
Read article →
Learn how to separate research findings from opportunities ready for approval or outreach. An operational method with fields, statuses, owners, and handoff rules.
A practical method for checking a sponsored publication after it goes live: agreed terms, editorial context, transparency, subsequent changes, and issues—without confusing operational verification with a guarantee of SEO results.
Learn how to set a sufficient evidence threshold to approve, postpone, investigate, or reject link building opportunities without mistaking more data for better decisions.
Learn to distinguish vetoes, trade-off variables, and documented exceptions to compare link building opportunities with greater consistency and context.
Learn how to prioritize link-building opportunity reviews with a tiered system that assigns the right level of research based on impact, reversibility, and replacement difficulty.
Learn to interpret the SERP as evidence of intent, formats, and editorial context when researching link-building collaborations using more robust criteria.
Learn how to review editorial collaborations across three layers to assess whether a link extends a genuine reader need and leads to a useful destination page.
A link building opportunity does not necessarily retain the same conditions as days pass. Learn which data to check again, when to do so, and how to document it without adding bureaucracy.
Create a free account and analyse opportunities in the private comparison tool.
